|
#91
09-29-2004, 08:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Brazil notes - MG PR SC
/Brazil/Southeast/Minas_Gerais/governador_valadadres/
/Brazil/Southeast/Minas_Gerais/governador_valadares/ -> Governador Valadares /Brazil/Southeast/Minas_Gerais/S_J_Del_Rei/ /Brazil/Southeast/Minas_Gerais/Sao_Joao_Del_Rei/ /Brazil/Southeast/Minas_Gerais/Sao_Joao_del_Rey/ -> Sao Joao Del Rey /Brazil/South/Parana/Foz/ /Brazil/South/Parana/foz_de_iguazu/ /Brazil/South/Parana/Foz_do_Iguacu/ /Brazil/South/Parana/Foz_do_Iguazu/ -> Foz do Iguaçu /Brazil/South/Parana/londrina/ -> Capital letters? /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/Florianoplis/ /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/florianopolis/ /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/Floriaopolis/ -> Florianopolis /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/blumenau/ /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/jaragua_do_sul/ /Brazil/South/Santa_Catarina/laguna/ -> Capital letters? 
|
|
#92
09-29-2004, 08:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Brazil notes - RS MT
/Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/Florianopolis/
-> Florianopolis is in Santa Catarina state - no photo here, you can delete it /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/Caxias_do/ /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/caxias_do_sul/ -> Caxias do Sul /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/caciqui/ /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/canoas/ /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/mostardas/ /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/porto_alegre/ -> Capital Letters? /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/URUGUAY/ /Brazil/South/Rio_Grande_do_Sul/URUGUAY_-_Sta_Teresa/ -> URUGUAY???? No idea. Maybe you should ask Mathias (mathiasmo) what is it for... /Brazil/Center-West/Mato_Grosso/Iguacu/ /Brazil/Center-West/Mato_Grosso/Iguasu/ -> Everything is wrong! It's South/Parana/Foz do Iguaçu That's all for now!
|
|
#93
02-24-2005, 05:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scotland >> Highland corrections
Why have you requested that Glen Coe and Glencoe get merged into the latter? Glencoe (without a space is a small village) within the Glen Coe area of the Scottish Highlands! I have noticed many pictures that show up in the village when in fact they were taken some miles away from there - within the Glen!
|
|
#94
02-24-2005, 08:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scotland >> Highland corrections
Keeping Glencoe images under Glen Coe is fine, but what I was suggesting is that at the higher level should only be Glencoe.
Just like: Scotland >> Argyll and Bute >> Loch Lomond Scotland >> Argyll and Bute >> lochlomond Should be merged to Loch Lomond. Also Glencoe is listed under both Argyll & Bute and the Highland. Is that correct?
|
|
#95
02-24-2005, 10:09 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scotland >> Highland corrections
Glen Coe should be in the Highland area, not Argyll & Bute.
I think the space is required as it is the larger area - Glencoe is the village and is also known as Bridge of Coe!
|
|
#96
03-01-2005, 12:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: cleaning up equipment/places database
All these links are fo the same camera - Canon EOS Digital Rebel/300D/Digital Kiss
http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1593 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=2208 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=2158 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1786 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1294 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1173 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=2179 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=2216 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=487 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1503 http://www.trekearth.com/photos.php?cat=camera&id=1672 Thank you for a great site!!!
|
|
#97
10-16-2005, 09:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Manhattan, New York City
Here's a few more:
under New York, there are far too many variations of New York City and Manhattan (well over a dozen)... they are basically all in Manhattan - most of the entries are misspellings
|
|
#98
10-16-2005, 09:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Washington, D.C., USA
All of the entries under
North_America/United_States/South/District_of_Columbia/ Should be merged under Washington Except for Georgetown & Arlington which should go under North_America/United_States/South/Virginia
|
|
#99
10-17-2005, 08:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: cleaning up equipment/places database
Some corrections for the Canon cameras:
Canon 20D Canon Eos D20 Canon Eos 20 D should all be merged under Canon Eos 20D the same with: Canon Eos 300 D and Canon Eos 300D should all be merged under Canon Eos 300D, Canon Eos 10 D and Canon Eos 10D should all be merged under Canon Eos 10D. I hope this helps? I could also do some corrections On The Germany/Nordrhein-Westfalen datatbase there are some mistakes.
|
|
#100
10-17-2005, 11:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: cleaning up equipment/places database
Hi Adam, thanks for the corrections.
Here's a few more I've noticed in the Pentax cameras... Pentax K 1000 should be merged into Pentax K1000 Pentax MZ50 should be merged into Pentax MZ-50 Pentax ME Super (sold) Pentax ME + Nikon V-ED scan should be merged into Pentax ME Pentax ist should be merged into Pentax *ist Pentax *ist DS should be merged into Pentax *istDS Pentax Optio 330 RS should be merged into Pentax Optio 330RS
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
